![]() |
|
STATEWIDE AND UPPER MIDWEST SUMMARY OF DEER-VEHICLE CRASH AND RELATED DATA FROM 1993 TO 2003:Executive SummaryGo To: | Illinois | Iowa | Michigan | Minnesota | Wisconsin | Region | |
Download Entire
Report (doc) |
Download
Entire Report (pdf) | |
|
This document contains a detailed summary and description of the deer-vehicle crash (DVC) problem between 1993 and 2003 in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Several different types of DVC-related data were obtained from the Department of Transportation, Department of Public Safety and/or the Department of Natural Resources in each of these states. More specifically, the University of Wisconsin Deer-Vehicle Crash Information Clearinghouse (DVCIC) were provided the annual total number of police reported crashes, vehicle-miles-traveled, reported DVCs or animal-vehicle crashes (AVCs) (from Iowa), and DVC/AVC injuries and fatalities. Annual deer population estimates were also obtained from four states and deer carcass removal numbers from three. All of these DVC- or AVC-related data were also combined, where appropriate, to summarize and describe this problem for the Upper Midwest region of the United States. Overall, this document describes the DVC/AVC problem in more detail than generally accomplished by individual states within the United States. A regional summary of this issue has not been attempted in the past. The
proper evaluation and combination of DVC- or AVC-related data requires
a complete understanding of the defining criteria for the data used. These
criteria can change from year to year and be different from state to state.
The criteria are noted, as appropriate, in the figures, tables, and text
of this document. The criteria of primary interest include the minimum
property damage reporting thresholds year to year in each state, the type
of data collected (DVCs or AVCs), how much of the state is summarized
within the data (e.g., does it include large cities), and what time period
do the deer population estimates represent (pre-hunt or post-hunt). In
some cases the data for a particular year in a particular state were also
questionable and not used. These reductions in data are noted where appropriate.
The general trends in the DVC/AVC data collected from each state and in
the region are described in this executive summary. Specific DVC or AVC
details about each state and the region can be found in their individual
data descriptions, figures, and summaries provided throughout the body
of this document. The data used to produce the figures in this report
are included in Appendices A-1 to A-6. The annual number of reported crashes in the Upper Midwest region has been relatively stable, but the annual number of reported DVCS or AVCs (in Iowa) increased by approximately 21 percent between 1993 and 2003. The regional growth in reported DVCs/AVCs was relatively quick from 1993 to 1995 and then at a slower rate from 1995 to 2003. The reported DVC/AVC trends in each state, however, were somewhat different than that shown by a combination of the data for the region. For example, the number of reported DVCs/AVCs in Illinois has increased overall and this occurred from 1993 to 1996 in Iowa and Michigan. However, the data from Minnesota shows a decrease in reported DVCs from 1993 to 1997 and then an increase. The number of reported DVCs in Wisconsin, on the other hand, has been relatively stable. In several states there have generally been some time periods in which reported DVCs/AVCs have decreased or been relatively stabile. The percentage of reported crashes represented by DVCs or AVCs has generally increased or remained stable in each of the five Upper Midwest states considered. In Illinois, Iowa, and Michigan this percentage has increased, but it has been relatively stable in Wisconsin. In Minnesota the percentage of all crashes represented by DVCs decreased from 1993 to 1996 and then increased. Regionally, the DVC/AVC percentage increased from 9.2 to 10.9 percent between 1993 and 2002 (the last year when data from all five states were available). This change represents an increase of approximately 18.5 percent in 10 years. The annual number of DVC/AVC injuries and fatalities reported in the Upper Midwest region has varied from state to state. In Iowa and Michigan an increase was observed from 1993 to 1997/1998 and then a decrease. In Minnesota the number of DVC/AVC injuries and fatalities has increased from 1993 to 2002. Illinois and Wisconsin have experienced increases from 2000 to 2003 and 1993 to 1994, respectively, but otherwise have reported annually variable or stable data. Overall, the annual number of DVC/AVC fatalities in the regional ranged from 12 to 45 (not including those data excluded and noted in the appropriate figures), and annual DVC/AVC injuries ranged from 3,888 to 5,324. An annual DVC or AVC rate per HMVMT was calculated for each state and the region from 1993 to 2003. Not surprisingly, statewide DVC/AVC rates generally follow the same pattern as the total number of reported DVCs/AVCs in the state. The DVC rate in Illinois increased from 1993 to 2003, and this also occurred from 1993 to 1996 in Iowa and Michigan. The DVC rate in Minnesota decreased from 1993 to 1997 and was then relatively stable. The rate in Wisconsin remained relatively stable from 1993 to 2003. Regionally, the DVC/AVC crash rate has also remained relatively stable, despite the consistent annual increase in regional AVMT. The stability of this measure (despite the AVMT increase) results from a general increase in reported DVCs/AVCs. Four
states (Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) in the region provided
annual deer population estimates, but only three states (Iowa, Minnesota,
and Wisconsin) provided data they had collected on their annual carcass
removal activities. The annual deer population estimates in three states
increased from 1993 to 2003, but the estimates completed in Michigan increased
from 1993 to 1995 and then decreased. Regionally, the annual deer population
estimates have been relatively cyclical. An increase in this regional
measure is shown from 1993 to 1995, a decrease from 1995 to 1997, and
then an increase until about 2000 before an apparent decrease. The annual
number of carcasses removed from three of the states, on the other hand,
has increased from 1993 to 1996 but remained relatively stable from that
point. This pattern could be the result of many factors, including program
funding and how the carcass removal data was collected and recorded. Each
year there are always more carcasses removed (salvageable and unsalvageable)
than DVCs/AVCs officially reported. The annual ratio of carcasses to reported
DVCs/AVCs ranged from about 1.4 to 1.6 in Iowa, 1.7 to 2.6 in Minnesota,
and 1.6 to 2.3 in Wisconsin. The average ratio regionally was about 2.0. The recommendations included in the last section of this document focus on improvements in the collection and combination of DVC or AVC data. It is recommended, for example, that the defining criteria and type of DVC/AVC-related data be documented for the entire United States. The time period evaluated should also be expanded to include annual data from pre-1993 and post-2003. It is also recommended that the bureaus or agencies that are collecting DVC/AVC-related data in each state be identified and that one person be assigned the task of obtaining and/or summarizing these data each year. A multi-disciplinary and public-private agency committee or coalition could also be created to consistently educate the driving public about this subject. Finally, it is also recommended that the value, collection, and use of carcass removal data and the police-report details of DVCs/AVCs be investigated further. Among other things, more specific information about carcass removal activities could change how the magnitude of the DVC/AVC problem is defined and where DVC/AVC countermeasures are considered. In addition, a closer examination of DVC/AVC reports may better explain the trends seen in this report. This report concludes with a recommendation that the type and origin of the DVC/AVC-related data used in papers and articles on this subject generally need to be more properly defined in the future. Confusion on this point, in some cases, has limited the value of DVC/AVC-related documents in the past.
|